Whoop
A 43-biomarker comprehensive health panel inspired by WHOOP Advanced Labs — a deep look at metabolism, cardiovascular risk, hormones, liver, kidney and inflammation.
The LDL/HDL ratio is your LDL cholesterol divided by your HDL. For anyone who measures their health seriously, this is probably the weakest number on the entire lipid report. No guideline sets a target for it, the number is calculated from an LDL that is itself already calculated, and VLDL and remnant particles do not count towards it. On top of that, endurance training flatters the ratio: HDL rises slightly, the ratio falls, and the amount of harmful cholesterol stays exactly the same. There is one situation in which the number does add something, namely androgen use, because both halves then move the wrong way at once. If you want to steer by something that counts, look at non-HDL cholesterol and ApoB.
Doctor's Assessment Included
No established reference range
There is no generally accepted Dutch reference value for the LDL/HDL ratio. The NVKC does publish a cholesterol ratio - total cholesterol divided by HDL (below 5, ideally below 3.5) - but no LDL/HDL ratio. The NHG-Standaard CVRM (2024) no longer uses a cholesterol ratio for risk assessment, looking instead at LDL- and non-HDL-cholesterol themselves. For the LDL/HDL ratio specifically there is therefore no Dutch standard we can show; we would rather state no number than one without a source. Discuss your cholesterol with your doctor, looking at your LDL, your non-HDL and, if useful, the cholesterol ratio (total/HDL).
Unit: ratio
Reference ranges may vary between laboratories. When you order a test, a BIG-registered doctor assesses your personal results in context. For treatment decisions, discuss your results with your GP.
The LDL/HDL ratio is nothing more than your LDL cholesterol divided by your HDL cholesterol. The lab measures those two, divides one by the other and prints the result. No extra tube of blood goes in, and no extra information comes out: everything in the ratio was already somewhere else on your report.
That sounds harmless, but it leaves the ratio vulnerable in two ways that bite precisely in your population.
The first is the calculation error the ratio inherits. In most laboratories your LDL is not measured but calculated, with the Friedewald formula: total cholesterol minus HDL minus triglycerides divided by 2.2. With high triglycerides or a non-fasting sample that assumption no longer holds. The calculated LDL then comes out too low, so your ratio looks better than reality. A blood draw after a carbohydrate-heavy loading phase, or simply too soon after your last meal, is enough to produce that effect. The cholesterol/HDL ratio does not have this problem, because it uses two directly measured values.
The second is what is missing. VLDL particles and the remnants left over from them do carry cholesterol into the artery wall, but they appear in neither the numerator nor the denominator. Anyone with high triglycerides and reduced insulin sensitivity sees none of that reflected in this number. Non-HDL cholesterol does count those particles.
This is not the same number as the cholesterol ratio. The cholesterol/HDL ratio uses total cholesterol in the numerator and has an upper limit around 5. This ratio uses only the LDL and sits around 3. They share a name and a denominator, and nothing else: do not confuse them.
If you track your blood values to perform better and recover better, this is the number you have least use for. That is not a figure of speech, it is where the guidelines stand. Both the European ESC/EAS guideline and the Dutch CVRM standard set targets on LDL cholesterol, with non-HDL cholesterol and ApoB as secondary goals. For the LDL/HDL ratio, no guideline sets a goal at all.
And there is an arithmetic illusion built into it. An LDL of 3.0 mmol/l with an HDL of 1.0 mmol/l gives a ratio of 3.0. An LDL of 4.5 mmol/l with an HDL of 1.5 mmol/l also gives exactly 3.0. Identical number, and yet the second person carries fifty percent more atherogenic cholesterol. It is that absolute LDL which accumulates in the artery wall, not the proportion. A ratio that looks good therefore says nothing until you place the individual values next to it.
For athletes there is a trap of their own on top of that. Regular endurance training raises HDL slightly, while LDL often barely moves. The ratio falls, your result looks better, and the amount of harmful cholesterol has stayed exactly the same. The number flatters you, and that feels like progress when nothing has been won.
There is one situation in which this ratio is in fact sharper than its components: the use of anabolic androgenic steroids. Androgens push HDL down substantially and drive LDL up. Both halves of the fraction therefore move the wrong way at once, which makes the ratio swing harder and earlier than the LDL or the HDL on their own. As a within-person trend, measured under the same conditions, that is usable information, and it is the only place where this ratio earns its spot on your report. It is not a reason to dose or change anything yourself: discuss it with a doctor.
For everything else: let non-HDL or ApoB carry more weight. Non-HDL needs no formula, does not break at high triglycerides and requires no fasting. ApoB counts the number of harmful particles instead of their cargo. Both say something this ratio cannot.
You do not order this ratio separately. It falls out of a lipid panel automatically once the LDL and the HDL have been determined, so the real question is how you take that panel.
Fasting counts for more here than for most lipids. Total cholesterol and HDL barely change after a meal, but triglycerides do, and your LDL is calculated from them. So test fasted, and avoid a draw straight after a carbohydrate-heavy loading phase or a period of heavy drinking. Above roughly 4.5 mmol/l of triglycerides the formula is no longer valid and the ratio says nothing at all.
Also take your training load into account. A long endurance session can temporarily lower triglycerides and slightly raise HDL, for up to a few days afterwards. If you want to compare values between two training blocks, always test at a comparable point in the week and at the same laboratory. And wait a few weeks after an infection, surgery or a significant injury: cholesterol falls temporarily in that period.
A newly abnormal result deserves a search for an underlying cause before you start adjusting your diet. An underactive thyroid raises LDL and is often missed, so a TSH belongs in the workup.
| Situation | What happens to LDL and HDL | What the ratio does |
|---|---|---|
| Man, no substance use | HDL is on average lower than in women | At the same LDL the ratio comes out structurally higher, so the unisex limit of 3.0 is in practice stricter for men |
| Woman, before menopause | Oestrogen keeps HDL higher | The ratio comes out structurally lower; comparing your number with your training partner's says little |
| Around and after menopause | LDL rises, HDL may fall slightly | Both halves move the same way, so the ratio climbs faster than the LDL alone |
| Regular endurance training | HDL rises slightly, LDL often stays flat | The ratio falls without the atherogenic burden having fallen: the number flatters you |
| Anabolic androgenic steroids | HDL falls substantially, LDL rises | The ratio worsens steeply and early; this is the one situation where it genuinely adds something as a trend |
| High triglycerides or a non-fasting draw | The calculated LDL comes out too low | The ratio looks favourable when it should not |
Have every result assessed by a doctor, together with your individual values and your full risk profile.
You cannot feel a low LDL/HDL ratio. Cholesterol gives no signals, whatever proportion it circulates in, so there are no symptoms of a low value. In itself a low ratio is not a problem either.
The point is that in a sports context a low ratio easily arises for the wrong reasons, and then reassures you when it should not. Regular endurance training raises HDL slightly, which lowers the ratio while your LDL stays unchanged: the number moves, the burden does not. Alcohol does the same thing and is emphatically not a way to improve your profile. A non-fasting draw or high triglycerides artificially depress the calculated LDL and therefore flatter the ratio as well. And after an infection, surgery or a spell out of training, cholesterol falls temporarily by itself.
So do not treat a good-looking ratio as a training result. Look at your LDL, your non-HDL and your ApoB, and have the whole picture assessed by a doctor.
A raised LDL/HDL ratio causes no symptoms. Atherosclerosis progresses entirely silently for years, and there is no symptom, no fatigue and no dip in performance from which you could read off an unfavourable cholesterol balance. What you notice belongs to the cause underneath, not to the number.
In a sports context a few causes stand out more often. Anabolic androgenic steroids push HDL down substantially and raise LDL, so the ratio worsens sharply in a short time. A protein- and fat-heavy diet high in saturated fat raises LDL. Low insulin sensitivity with high triglycerides lowers HDL. And smoking lowers HDL as well.
Just as important are the causes that have nothing to do with sport and are skipped over far too often: an underactive thyroid, poorly controlled diabetes, kidney or liver disease and a number of medicines. A raised ratio is therefore not a diagnosis and not proof of cardiovascular disease. It is a reason to pull up the individual values and to discuss them with a doctor.
The most important advice with this number is: do not steer by it. A fraction can be improved in two ways, and the easier of the two, pushing HDL up, changes nothing about the amount of harmful cholesterol ending up in your artery wall. Large trials of agents that specifically raise HDL showed exactly that: HDL went up, risk did not come down. So steer by your LDL and by non-HDL cholesterol or ApoB, and use the ratio at most as a slow background trend.
What genuinely lowers LDL is well known: less saturated and trans fat, more fibre, a healthy body composition and regular activity. For athletes that often means an honest look at a diet built around the protein, into which a lot of saturated fat has quietly crept.
Alcohol emphatically does not belong here. It raises HDL and so makes the ratio look better, but it raises triglycerides at the same time and does not improve your cholesterol profile. Smoking lowers HDL; stopping is one of the few steps where the number and your health move in the same direction.
If you use androgens or are considering them, this is not a subject to self-manage from a blood value. The effect on HDL is large and fast, and that conversation belongs with a doctor.
And finally: never start, stop or change a cholesterol-lowering medicine yourself on the basis of a self-ordered result.
These panels measure values from the same category as this marker.
A 43-biomarker comprehensive health panel inspired by WHOOP Advanced Labs — a deep look at metabolism, cardiovascular risk, hormones, liver, kidney and inflammation.
A 45-biomarker heart health panel inspired by the WHOOP Heart Health Panel — an advanced look at cholesterol, lipoproteins, inflammation and kidney function.
A 51-biomarker metabolic panel inspired by the WHOOP Metabolic Health Panel — blood sugar regulation, insulin, thyroid, liver and the mineral cofactors behind your metabolism.
A 50-biomarker performance panel inspired by the WHOOP Performance Health Panel — recovery, blood production, thyroid, hormones, iron and nutrient status for people who train.
Medical reviewer
Dr. Naimi oversees the medical standards behind our content and assessments.
Medical policyDoctor's Assessment Included
Every result includes a professional assessment from a BIG-registered doctor. For treatment decisions, discuss your results with your GP.